What is Review Bombing?
Review Bombing is a coordinated online tactic where a large group of people posts a flood of negative reviews for a product, service, brand, or piece of media in a very short period. It can occur on popular platforms (like Google reviews, Yelp, or Facebook) or on e-commerce platforms or gaming platforms. Amazon
Unlike a typical “bad review,” a review bomb is rarely about the actual quality of the product. Instead, the primary aim of review bombing is to manipulate its average score and harm its online reputation. The influence of review bombing can affect video games, movies, streaming content, and businesses, potentially resulting in significant reputational damage and millions of dollars in lost revenue. But how can one identify whether reviews reflect honest opinions or are part of a review-bombing strategy? Review bombing raises some crucial questions:
- Is review bombing always a malicious act?
- Can it ever lead to positive change?
- Is it genuine feedback or just online outrage?
Genuine Reviews Vs Review Bombing
Genuine reviews show a user’s honest experience with a product, service, or content, focusing on user experiences with specific details like its real quality, features, or performance. Real reviews appear gradually and can vary in tone, based on the user’s perspective. For instance, a gamer writes, “The new update improved graphics, but the controls feel clunky,” giving 3-4 stars. Focus is on the product itself.
On the other hand, review bombing consists of coordinated reviews (often extreme in score) that are intended to influence ratings for reasons unrelated to the product itself, such as protesting a controversy or company decision. The reviews often happen in sudden spikes and are often vague or identical.
For example, thousands post 1-star ratings of the same game because the game developer added a controversial feature, not because of gameplay. Focus is on external controversy, not quality.
Genuine Reviews Vs Review Bombing
However, review bombing is not always the same. It happens for various reasons, and understanding the type of review bombing helps brands and platforms respond better.
Types of Review Bombing
The types of review bombing are based on common patterns and motivations behind this behavior/act.
Protest-Based Review Bombing
This is the most common type of review bombing, where users leave 1–2 star reviews to protest a company decision, policy change, or public controversy, rather than the product itself. These reviews often focus on anger, boycott calls, or dissatisfaction with external issues instead of reflecting real user experience.
Coordinated or Organized Review Bombing
In this type, reviews are posted in a planned and coordinated way, often through social media platforms, forums, or messaging apps. People are encouraged to post negative reviews at the same time to manipulate ratings and influence public perception.
Sometimes, users organize on platforms like Discord, Reddit, or Telegram to post reviews at a specific “zero hour.” By hitting a product all at once, they ensure the score drops so rapidly that it catches the attention of the media and the algorithm.
Retaliation Review Bombing
This happens as a form of revenge or frustration, where users leave negative reviews after facing bans, account suspensions, content removals, price increases, or enforcement of strict rules.
Unlike “Protest” bombing, this behavior is usually done by the actual customers who frame their reviews around perceived unfair treatment or personal loss, rather than genuine product-related issues.
Competitive Review Bombing
This type of review bombing is usually done by competitors or their supporters who leave fake negative reviews to damage a rival’s reputation. This is commonly seen in app stores, local business listings, and eCommerce platforms. Reviews are mostly from new or inactive accounts, mentioning vague complaints, without any evidence of actual product usage.
Meme or Trend-Driven Review Bombing
This form of review bombing spreads through online trends or viral moments. Users participate just to be part of the crowd, not because they have actually used the product. Although it may seem harmless, it can damage ratings and credibility.
This type often includes joke-style or sarcastic reviews based on a funny glitch, viral image, or trending post that later floods the review section.
Now that we’ve looked at the different types of review bombing, it is important to understand what actually motivates people to participate in it.
Why does Review Bombing happen?
There are several reasons for review bombing, where a large number of users deliberately leave negative (or sometimes positive) reviews. Some of them are:
- Strong emotional reactions (such as anger or disappointment) often push users to leave negative reviews to express frustration, especially after controversial updates or decisions.
- Many users turn to review bombing when they feel companies or creators ignore their complaints. A large number of negative ratings can pressure companies to respond.
- Outrage spreads quickly on social media and online communities, prompting large groups to join in, even if they haven’t used the product.
- Some review bombs are driven by political, cultural, or ideological disagreements rather than the actual product quality.
- Posting a review takes very little effort and time, making it easy for many people to act at once and create a noticeable impact.
- Online anonymity encourages harsher or unfair opinions since users don’t face real-world consequences.
- In some cases, review bombing is used intentionally to hurt the product’s/brand’s reputation, either by competitors or organized groups.
Beyond the reasons behind review bombing, questions often arise about its legal implications.
Is Review Bombing Illegal?
| When Review Bombing Is Not Illegal | When Review Bombing Can Be Illegal |
|
|
Whether legal or not, review bombing often follows predictable, drip-like patterns that reveal coordinated intent.
Drip-Like Tactics in Review Bombing
In many cases, review bombing follows patterns similar to drip email campaigns, where messages are sent in a timed, coordinated way to trigger mass action. Organized groups often use emails, private messages, Discord alerts, or social media posts to prompt users to leave reviews at specific times. This leads to an unnatural surge of ratings that platforms can easily flag.
Common red flags include:
- Multiple reviews were posted within minutes of each other using similar wording or tone.
- New or inactive accounts make up a huge percentage of the reviews.
- Sudden rating drops (such as from 4.5 stars to 2 stars overnight)
This behavior reflects drip campaigns, where scheduled prompts repeatedly remind participants to act—except the goal here is not marketing but manipulating public perception. Such patterns strongly indicate coordinated review bombing, rather than genuine customer feedback.
Let us have a look at some real-world examples of review bombing.
Stranger Things Season 5
Trailer was review-bombed and reportedly received thousands of negative reviews in response to controversy surrounding a character’s storyline.
Ghostbusters (2016)
Backlash on IMDb and YouTube (via the trailer’s dislike button) came largely from criticisms aimed at the all-female cast. The film received thousands of 1-star reviews in a short period.
Grand Theft Auto V (2017)
A Steam review bomb occurred after Take-Two issued a cease-and-desist against OpenIV, a popular modding tool. The goal was to stop single-player and multiplayer mods. Many players gave 1-star reviews to protest restrictions on mods rather than the game itself.
Captain Marvel (2019)
Before the movie even hit theaters, many negative reviews flooded platforms like Rotten Tomatoes and IMDb due to comments made by actress Brie Larson regarding diversity in film criticism. The backlash was so intense that Rotten Tomatoes eventually disabled the “Want to See” score and adjusted its system to prevent users from reviewing movies before they are released.
Epic Games Store / Borderlands 3 (2019)
Steam reviews for older Borderlands titles were bombed in protest when Borderlands 3 became an Epic Games Store exclusive. Ratings fell sharply, showing platform loyalty and exclusivity can trigger coordinated campaigns.
Warcraft III: Reforged (2020)
Fans criticized the missing promised features in trailers and a mandatory update that broke the original game for existing owners. The Metacritic score reached a historic low of 0.5/10 in days, showing the immediate impact of coordinated backlash.
These examples show the power of review bombing, but let us see the impact it really has on businesses, creators, and audiences.
The Impact of Review Bombing: Good, Bad, or Ugly?
Review bombing can affect businesses, creators, and consumers in very different ways:
| The Good | The Bad | The Ugly |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In short, review bombing can sometimes spark positive change, but more often it hurts reputations, misleads audiences, and creates lasting damage.
How to Identify Review Bombing
Spotting review bombing is essential for businesses and creators to protect their reputation. There are various key signs that reviews may be part of a coordinated campaign rather than a genuine opinion:
Sudden Spikes in Review Volume
A business or product that normally receives a steady number of reviews suddenly gets a large wave within hours or days, often without any major product update or launch, sales event, or holiday.
Normal Reviews- 10–20 reviews a day
Review Bomb – 4,000 reviews in 6 hours
Extreme Rating Patterns
During review bombing, most reviews fall at the extremes—either 1 star or 5 stars. There is usually little middle-ground feedback. Genuine customers tend to leave mixed opinions, while review bombers aim to push ratings up or down quickly.
Repetitive or Vague Language
As many review bombs are automated (bots) or organized via social media, the text often looks similar. The same words, phrases, or complaints appear again and again, suggesting coordination or copy-paste behavior rather than independent opinions.
Lack of Real Experience or Detail
Bombing reviews are often short and vague. They don’t mention specific features, services, or interactions. Instead, they mention general statements like “worst ever” or “total scam” without explaining the reason.
New or Inactive Reviewer Accounts
A large number of reviews may come from accounts with little or no history. These profiles often have no photo, no past reviews, or were created recently just to post a rating.
Repeated Mentioning of the Same Event or Controversy
If many reviews reference the same news story, viral clip, or social media trend, it’s a strong signal of review bombing. Genuine reviews rarely focus on one external event.
Sudden Drop or Jump in Overall Rating
When review bombing occurs, the overall rating can change dramatically in a very short time. A highly rated product or business may suddenly lose trust overnight.
To handle review bombing more effectively, online platforms now use AI-driven systems that continuously monitor reviews.
The Role of AI in Monitoring Review Bombing
Artificial Intelligence (AI) plays a major role in detecting, tracking, and controlling review bombing across online platforms. AI continuously monitors review activity and looks for sudden spikes in ratings or reviews. When a product or business receives an abnormal number of reviews all at once, AI flags the activity as suspicious.
AI also compares review text, phrases, or sentences. If many reviews sound almost the same, the system recognizes them as coordinated rather than genuine.Extremely negative or overly positive language used repeatedly can signal a review bombing attempt. AI checks reviewer behavior, such as account age, activity history, and posting patterns. Accounts created recently or used only for posting one review are more likely to be flagged.
AI can help platforms remove fake reviews quickly.
How Platforms Combat Review Bombing
| Platform | How They Handle Review Bombing |
| Steam | Detects sudden review spikes, labels reviews as “off-topic,” and may temporarily exclude them from the overall score to reduce unfair impact. |
| Rotten Tomatoes | Uses verified audience reviews, separates critic and audience scores, and limits reviews to confirmed ticket buyers. |
| Metacritic | Applies time delays on user reviews, moderates suspicious activity, and adjusts scores when coordinated attacks are detected. |
| Uses AI to identify fake or repeated reviews, removes policy-violating content, and may hide reviews during investigations. | |
| Yelp | Flags suspicious reviews, filters out fake accounts, and places warning notices when unusual review activity is detected. |
When review bombing strikes, the right response can protect trust and reduce long-term damage.
How to Prevent & Respond to Review Bombing
How to Prevent & Respond to Review Bombing
Review bombing can feel overwhelming, especially when it happens suddenly. While you can’t always stop it from happening, the right preparation and response can protect your brand, reputation, and customer trust.
Monitor Reviews Regularly
Regularly track reviews across platforms like Google, Yelp, app stores, and social media. Early detection helps you to respond before the situation escalates. Sudden spikes in negative reviews or repeated complaints are often the early warning signs.
Respond Professionally
Emotional or defensive responses can make things worse. Instead, reply with empathy and clarity. A calm, factual response reassures real customers that you are listening and acting responsibly, even during criticism.
Report Suspicious Activity
Most platforms provide tools to flag false or policy-violating reviews. Report reviews that are clearly unrelated, abusive, or posted by fake accounts. This enables platforms to investigate and remove harmful content faster.
Encourage Authentic Customer Feedback
Ask genuine customers to share honest reviews after real experiences. Ethical review requests help balance unfair attacks and restore brand or product credibility over time.
Reach Out to Platform Support
If you suspect review bombing, report it directly to the platform. Share clear evidence, like sudden review spikes or repeated comments. This helps the platform investigate faster and remove fake or coordinated reviews.
Implement Preventive Strategies
- Use Review Controls – Enable available review settings to reduce spam or reviews from unverified users.
- Boost Customer Relationships – A strong base of real, satisfied customers helps balance out unfair or fake reviews.
- Encourage Ongoing Engagement – Stay connected with your audience so genuine voices remain active and visible.
- Prepare for Future Events– Create a clear response plan, so your team can act quickly if review bombing happens again.
To put these prevention and response strategies into practice, many organizations rely on dedicated reputation management software and structured review campaigns.
Tools for Reputation & Review Management
To effectively manage the fallout from review bombing, you can monitor, analyze, and respond to online feedback, as well as use tools that support ethical review gathering.
- Birdeye – A well-known reputation platform that aggregates reviews from hundreds of sites, alerts you to new feedback, and lets you respond from a single dashboard.
- Brand24 – More oriented toward social listening and sentiment tracking, but extremely useful for spotting unexpected spikes in online conversation volumes.
- Mention – Social listening and review tracking tools that help catch brand mentions and sentiment shifts, useful for early detection of coordinated review attacks.
- Google Alerts – While not a full reputation suite, it’s a free way to get notified when your brand is mentioned across the web, which can help spot emerging issues early.
Tools That Help With Positive Review Campaigns
While many reputation tools also include review generation, some focus more on ethical review invitations and engagement:
- Automated review invites (Birdeye, Podium, Yext, Reputation.com) – Integrates email/SMS prompts after key interactions to encourage authentic customer reviews.
- On-site review widgets (Trustpilot) – Embed review feeds and invitations directly on your website to make it easier for satisfied users to share feedback.
- Social listening workflows (Brand24 or Mention) – Let you track broader sentiment and invite happy users on social channels to leave reviews on neutral third-party sites.
Case Study
How a U.S. Local Restaurant Recovered from COVID Review Bombing Through Community Support
(Business details anonymized. A real COVID-era reputation incident shared with permission.)
- Industry: Dining restaurant
- Location: Suburban Midwest (U.S.)
- Years in Operation: 5+ years
- Pre-COVID Google Rating: 4.5 ⭐ (900+ reviews)
- Primary Traffic Source: Google Maps & local search
The restaurant had a loyal neighborhood customer base and strong weekend foot traffic before COVID restrictions.
What Triggered the Review Bombing (Mid-2020):
During the COVID restrictions, the restaurant:
- Switched to takeout-only service
- Enforced mask requirements for pickups
- Limited indoor access to comply with county health orders
A frustrated customer posted a Facebook rant accusing the staff of being “rude and unhelpful.” The post was shared widely in local community groups. Within days, Google reviews spiked abnormally.
The Impact:
- 140+ one-star reviews posted
- Google rating dropped from 4.5 → 3.3
- Many reviews mentioned policies and not food, came from profiles with no prior review history
- Google Maps visibility went down
Identifying the red flags:
- Repeated phrases like “won’t let customers inside.”
- Reviews from accounts located outside the county
- No mention of actual menu items or visits
The Recovery:
- The restaurant explained state and county health mandates
- Clarified temporary service limitations
- Thanked customers for their patience
Community Support:
- Long-time customers stepped in
- Shared positive experiences in local online groups
- Left experience-based reviews like “Coming here for years. Staff have always been great.”
- Uploaded photos from prior visits
- Mentions by local food bloggers
- Comments from nearby small business owners
Over the next several weeks, Google:
- Removed multiple reviews
- Reduced the weighting of suspicious activity
- Stabilized the rating naturally – 3.3 ⭐ to 4.4 ⭐
What Worked:
- Real customers comment
- Community validation
- Google favors authentic review patterns
This case reflects a real scenario observed across multiple U.S. small businesses during COVID-related restrictions.
Conclusion
Review bombing is loud, fast, and often unfair—but its impact doesn’t have to be permanent. Transparency, calm communication, and genuine reviews can restore trust and visibility. Platforms ultimately reward authentic reviews over coordinated bombing, making long-term customer relationships the strongest defense against reputation attacks.
